Originally Posted by merumario Originally Posted by babe Originally Posted by merumario I will believe it when it occurs.

Purchase Cover Letter Service Qualified 10PagePapers Website
October 29, 2018
Ghost-writing – eine in die Tiefe Analyse, Was Funktioniert und Was nicht
October 30, 2018

Originally Posted by merumario Originally Posted by babe Originally Posted by merumario I will believe it when it occurs.

Since interpretation is often subjective there has been much divide in existing religions as many more people have become literate and have challenged orthodox views.We do not know who the first theists are; remember that most theological systems now are dependent on sacred scripture which probably wasn’t around at the time (certainly if they did no fragments remain), the first theists were likely those who were just incredibly superstitous, finding the truth through faith is always a leap and I would agree that to do so we should look at the historical context, but we do not have any remaining fragments, it’s likely that if they had a theological system it was precisely what started to appear in sacred texts.This isn’t an incredibly coherent response so for that I do apologise, but I will conclude by restating some of the above in a more comprehendable manner, the main points are: a) the first theological system can not be pinpointed, b) the first theological system would have been oral (or maybe expressed through paintings, stone etc, no fragments really survive though), c) modern day theological systems most likely derive from tradition and oral legend that was eventually written, d) if they don’t it’s likely because the people who believed in such a religion were killed or had different views imposed on them, e) religion is an excellent way of establishing a social hierarchy and obedience. Originally Posted by Lynx_Fox Just for clarity the prenuptial counseling is rather routine and not developed by the priest–he’s a trusted messenger. Left the Catholic faith at the age of 14.The priest was screwing the organ player (ironic isn’t it).

They forgot allowing priests to marry. Only today have I learned that Pope custom essay us
Francis is ready to dilute the witch-hunt against gays, is prepared to lessen the opposition to abortion and contraception, and even reach out to women!! Now there’s progress and it’s only taken them 2 millennia. HOW in the WORLD does he have a CLUE! All this years this ain’t occurred to me. It can arise from series of marriage problems that he has helped out with…..that kind of experience despite being unmarried is invaluable# Maybe not BETTER counselors, but as far as living a married life day to day as a couple and living the life of a priest, I don’t believe a priest has the capacity to understand that kind of relationship.AND I certainly don’t think a priest could COUNSEL you on sexual problems in a marriage.

Fair enough, but they should be allowed to marry…..then they’d get the 360 of the entire experience! After all have been said and agreed,does it really imply that most people who are married are good counselors? Or better than priest?The experience of the priest doesn’t really need to be subjective. And most priest have extensive counseling training and experience along the way–between their undergraduate degree, seminary and experiences before their ordination. Fair enough, but they should be allowed to marry…..then they’d get the 360 of the entire experience!

I find it ironic that Catholic friends had to go to a priest for pre-marriage “counseling”. I don’t see the Catholic Church changing. Next chance I get I’ll ask someone still close to the Catholic church what they do now days. Originally Posted by babe Originally Posted by merumario Originally Posted by babe Originally Posted by Lynx_Fox Just for clarity the prenuptial counseling is rather routine and not developed by the priest–he’s a trusted messenger. It’s a lot easier and required less skill than marriage counseling that might be needed later.

I was a catholic once before I realised there was no god up there. Augustine commented, there was no real difference between the worship of a pagan god and the Christian version.Does the celibate priest understand marriage? In one aspect he probably does because he sees a lot of people and becomes like an agony uncle. After that, power does its thing. Passed down through generations it has become acceptable to not only embrace but obey those in charge.

It’s a lot easier and required less skill than marriage counseling that might be needed later. I simply go to the ocean or the mountains or, the golf course, which is peaceful, quiet and beautiful ….and reflect….while walking. It’s a lot easier and required less skill than marriage counseling that might be needed later.

I’m thinking that the first people to establish a hierarchy for their religion are responsible for much of what we see today. Most religions that have existed on earth have failed. From those I know who still do Catholic church and marriage about the same as they always have!As to the “hands on” *chuckle*….my mind went there too! I find it ironic that Catholic friends had to go to a priest for pre-marriage “counseling”. But like St.

These guys are a lot smarter and wiser than you think. It can arise from series of marriage problems that he has helped out with…..that kind of experience despite being unmarried is invaluable# Originally Posted by Trivium This is merely a hypothesis.I would say that some religions have disappered due to them not being flexible enough to establish a social hierarchy, not good enough to explain natural phenomena, lost as a result of conquest or because the original individuals no longer believed it themselves. The Romans worshipped various gods including Mithras.

It’s a lot easier and required less skill than marriage counseling that might be needed later. But there might be how! I am sorry, I am not understanding.

And most priest have extensive counseling training and experience along the way–between their undergraduate degree, seminary and experiences before their ordination. I will believe it when it occurs. It’s a lot easier and required less skill than marriage counseling that might be needed later.

Originally Posted by ox Originally Posted by babe Originally Posted by ox Originally Posted by zinjanthropos So far the consensus seems to be that the first religion is still here, evolving and branching off into different versions of itself, akin to the evolutionary tree. Next chance I get I’ll ask someone still close to the Catholic church what they do now days. He doesn’t have HANDS ON, so to speak experience of that type of intimacy!

Agree with you babe just as lynx fox said,I try and ask around# Originally Posted by babe He doesn’t have HANDS ON, so to speak experience of that type of intimacy! (looking up)In the name of the father, spirit and holy ghost…help me resist temptation!…Sorry :-)I do agree with you babe…. few clergy have sufficient training to deal with the day to day marriage counseling, which takes far more skills than prenuptial counseling. Didn’t find anything there for me but some nice music……..years later my parents became ordained Pentecostal ministers…talk about a swing!I like nature…..that is where I find my solace and my peace when I need to look at something. He doesn’t have HANDS ON, so to speak experience of that type of intimacy! ok, well 3 days ago, a close friend went to hospital after stomach pains and was diagnosed as having apendacitis. last night, about 2 hours before his surgery was scheduled, his appendix burst.i have been told that this can have serious effects, but that is the extent of it, anyone know what these “serious effects” are?thanks In other words it’s about as slow as biological evolution. And most priest have extensive counseling training and experience along the way–between their undergraduate degree, seminary and experiences before their ordination.

And most priest have extensive counseling training and experience along the way–between their undergraduate degree, seminary and experiences before their ordination. When he let them down in war that was the end of him and the Christian god was seen as a better bet to preserve the empire. HOW in the WORLD does he have a CLUE! The Catholic Church is losing members in various places around the world, so it has to change or face losing power and being marginalised. It adapts to the social conditions of the era I assume.

It can arise from series of marriage problems that he has helped out with…..that kind of experience despite being unmarried is invaluable# Maybe not BETTER counselors, but as far as living a married life day to day as a couple and living the life of a priest, I don’t believe a priest has the capacity to understand that kind of relationship.AND I certainly don’t think a priest could COUNSEL you on sexual problems in a marriage. Just for clarity the prenuptial counseling is rather routine and not developed by the priest–he’s a trusted messenger. And most priest have extensive counseling training and experience along the way–between their undergraduate degree, seminary and experiences before their ordination. Fair enough, but they should be allowed to marry…..then they’d get the 360 of the entire experience!

After all have been said and agreed,does it really imply that most people who are married are good counselors? Or better than priest?The experience of the priest doesn’t really need to be subjective. Originally Posted by merumario Originally Posted by babe Originally Posted by merumario I will believe it when it occurs. I don’t see the Catholic Church changing. They forgot allowing priests to marry.

Originally Posted by merumario Originally Posted by babe Originally Posted by Lynx_Fox Just for clarity the prenuptial counseling is rather routine and not developed by the priest–he’s a trusted messenger. Originally Posted by babe Originally Posted by Lynx_Fox Just for clarity the prenuptial counseling is rather routine and not developed by the priest–he’s a trusted messenger. Fair enough, but they should be allowed to marry…..then they’d get the 360 of the entire experience! After all have been said and agreed,does it really imply that most people who are married are good counselors?

Or better than priest?The experience of the priest doesn’t really need to be subjective. Originally Posted by Lynx_Fox Originally Posted by babe He doesn’t have HANDS ON, so to speak experience of that type of intimacy! (looking up)In the name of the father, spirit and holy ghost…help me resist temptation!…Sorry :-)I do agree with you babe…. few clergy have sufficient training to deal with the day to day marriage counseling, which takes far more skills than prenuptial counseling. I meant;it never occurred to me about catholics going to priest that aren’t married for marriage counseling#[/QUOTE]How can you counsel on what you don’t know?

This is merely a hypothesis.Let’s first lay out some (well accepted) definitions:religion – a belief system.theism – a belief in God.If we look at the current state of society religions seem to be associated with tradition and isolation, the west is predominately Christian, the Arab world predominately Islam; these theological systems are rooted in centuries of development that were developed independently of one another for a variety of reasons.I would say that the reasons below are reasonable assumptions although none of them may be true: – Establish a social hierarchy and a way of obtaining unchallenged authority (obviously incredibly important when we moved from hunting to agriculture). – To explain natural phenomena.- To establish a complex mythological system deriving from cultural traditions (e.g in the case of the Greeks) usually to do the above.- Because they actually believe in the existence in God or Gods.- Rituals and superstitous behaviour in general.I would say that some religions have disappered due to them not being flexible enough to establish a social hierarchy, not good enough to explain natural phenomena, lost as a result of conquest or because the original individuals no longer believed it themselves.We must remember that theological systems are not like science in that they do not really progress in the manner of science but rather extend in terms of understanding through hermeneutics.

Comments are closed.